Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/13/1963
Brewer v. Brewer
Citations
- 129 S.E.2d 736
- 242 S.C. 9
- 1963 S.C. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the use of the word “or” in a statute “is a disjunctive particle that marks an alternative”
- noting that the use of the word “or” in a statute “is a disjunctive particle that marks an alternative”
- “From early days, courts of equity in this state have, in proper cases, ordered separate support and mainte-nance____” (Bussey, J., concurring)
- “The word ‘or’ used in a statute, is a disjunctive particle that marks an alternative. The word ‘or’ used in a statute imports choice between two alternatives and as ordinarily used, means one or the other of two, but not both.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moss, Taylor, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford, Rrailsford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
- Laird v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-01-02· cited 96×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-02-26· cited 48×
- Hawkins v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1974-07-22· cited 34×
- Hatchett v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-07-15· cited 27×
- K & a Acquisition Group, LLC v. Island Pointe, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-10· cited 25×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Security Fire & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-08-04· cited 21×
- Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-02-09· cited 20×
- City of Columbia v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-05-08· cited 13×
- McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-03-08· cited 13×
- Ariail v. AriailCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-09· cited 11×
- Nocher v. NocherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-05-11· cited 7×
- Moyle v. MoyleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-04-03· cited 6×
- Theisen v. TheisenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 6×
- Mungo v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-04· cited 5×
- Investors Premium Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-01-03· cited 5×
- Martin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-09-02· cited 5×
- State v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-01-05· cited 5×
- Martin v. BayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-09-19· cited 3×
- LeFORS v. LeFORSSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-05-24· cited 3×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Houge v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-06-24· cited 55×
- Field v. GREGORYSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-08-07· cited 46×
- Machado v. MachadoSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-08-31· cited 42×
- Benson v. BensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-04-24· cited 27×
- Town of Forest Acres v. SeiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-09-28· cited 19×
- White v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1928-03-10· cited 19×
- McCreery v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1895-04-20· cited 17×
- Deigaard v. DeigaardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-09-24· cited 16×
- Beaty v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1899-10-11· cited 14×
- Bohlen v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-09-13· cited 10×
- Huckabee Transport Corp. v. Western Assurance Co. of TorontoSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-07-26· cited 9×
- Harrison v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-11-23· cited 9×
- Wood v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-07-31· cited 6×
- Shepard v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1899-04-03· cited 6×
- Erie Railroad Co. v. American Automobile Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1955-06-14· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Starr Piano Co. v. BeebeOhio Court of Appeals· 1921-12-16· cited 2×
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1879-04-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.