Skip to main content

Irby v. State

Citations

  • 327 S.W.3d 138
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 725
  • 2010 WL 2382594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant did not have a constitutional right to question a witness about his status as a juvenile probationer
  • explaining that trial courts retain “wide latitude” to impose reasonable limits on cross-examination based on concerns about such matters as prejudice, confusion of issues, and questioning that is only marginally relevant
  • explaining that trial courts retain \wide latitude\ to impose reasonable limits on cross-examination based on concerns about such matters as prejudice, confusion of issues, and questioning that is only marginally relevant
  • interpreting Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974), and requiring a “logical connection between the evidence suggesting bias or motive and the witness’s testimony”
  • observing trial court has “wide latitude to impose reasonable limits on [] cross- examination” during “interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant”
  • discussing how the Confrontation Clause may require admission of evidence reasonably calculated to expose a witness’s motive, bias, or interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Irby v. State

26 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.