Court of Appeals of Texas· 6/18/2014
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 433 S.W.3d 546
- 2014 WL 2742829
- 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting defendant is not entitled to “cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent,” he might wish
- stating defendant, as proponent of 31 evidence, must establish causal connection or logical relationship between excluded evidence and witness’ alleged bias or motive
- stating “the proffered evidence need not definitively prove the bias alleged—it need only ‘make the existence’ of bias ‘more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence’”
- “[I]t is not within a trial court’s discretion to prohibit a defendant from engaging in otherwise appropriate cross-examination designed to show a prototypical form of bias on the part of the witness.” (internal quotations omitted)
- “Rather, ‘[t]he main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross- examination[,]’ because that is ‘the principal means by which the believability of a witness and the truth of his testimony are tested.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alcala, Cochran, Hervey, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-05-25· cited 321×
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-02· cited 297×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-10-10· cited 34×
- Ette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-05-18· cited 23×
- Beltran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-03-08· cited 11×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-03-27· cited 11×
- Anthony G. Hereford, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-09-08· cited 5×
- Dedric D'Shawn Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2017-08-01· cited 4×
- Quincy Deshan Butler v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2015-01-13
- Marcia Jacqueline Dinanno v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2015-02-26
- Patricia Ann Adams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-09-18
- Latray M. Whitley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-07-23
- David Michael Dollins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-01-08
- Butler, Quincy DeshanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-02-20
- Ricky Neal Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2015-03-26
- Ricky Neal Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2015-05-08
- Roderick Beham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-15
- Torres, Aaron AnthonyTexas Supreme Court· 2015-11-03
- Anderson, BrandonTexas Supreme Court· 2015-12-01
- David Garcia Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-20
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- Hammer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-08· cited 593×
- Potier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-02-13· cited 554×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-24· cited 415×
- United States v. Wesley WillieTenth Circuit· 1991-08-12· cited 167×
- Carpenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-30· cited 161×
- Irby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 141×
- Hurd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-02-25· cited 101×
- United States v. LandermanFifth Circuit· 1997-03-31· cited 64×
- Spain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-06· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.