Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 433 S.W.3d 546
  • 2014 WL 2742829
  • 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting defendant is not entitled to “cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent,” he might wish
  • stating defendant, as proponent of 31 evidence, must establish causal connection or logical relationship between excluded evidence and witness’ alleged bias or motive
  • stating “the proffered evidence need not definitively prove the bias alleged—it need only ‘make the existence’ of bias ‘more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence’”
  • “[I]t is not within a trial court’s discretion to prohibit a defendant from engaging in otherwise appropriate cross-examination designed to show a prototypical form of bias on the part of the witness.” (internal quotations omitted)
  • “Rather, ‘[t]he main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross- examination[,]’ because that is ‘the principal means by which the believability of a witness and the truth of his testimony are tested.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Cochran, Hervey, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.