Skip to main content

Carroll v. State

Citations

  • 916 S.W.2d 494
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
  • 1996 WL 22736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] trial judge may limit cross-examination when a subject is exhausted. . . .”
  • “This broad scope necessarily includes cross-examination concerning criminal charges pending against a witness and over which those in need of the witness’[s] testimony might be empowered to exercise control.”
  • Trial court may limit cross examination on irrelevant subjects.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Keller, Baird, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

313 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.