Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/12/1987

Janecka v. State

Citations

739 S.W.2d 813
1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant has no standing to complain of an illegal search of another’s residence
holding that defendant has no standing to complain of an illegal search of another’s residence
holding, based upon prior arrests and incarcerations, the accused was familiar with his Sixth -5- 09-00349-CR Amendment rights, and specifically waived his right to counsel
limitation of impeachment proper where defendant attempted to show witness's spouse had entered into plea bargain with State but failed to show why this would influence witness's testimony
limitation of impeachment proper where defendant attempted to show witness’s spouse had entered into plea bargain with State but failed to show why this would influence witness’s testimony
“[N]otice defects in indictments are matters of form[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Duncan, Onion, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

149 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.