Skip to main content

Irby v. State

Citations

  • 893 So. 2d 1042
  • 2004 WL 2749134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel’s “vague[]” objection that the instruction was “highly prejudicial . . . lack[ed] the specificity our precedent requires to preserve the issue for appeal”
  • general objection that jury instruction is “prejudicial,” without more, is insufficient to preserve for appeal
  • “Irby cannot 8 now argue that the instruction was in error since he dropped the objection and agreed that the instruction, as amended and given, was appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, P.J., Graves and Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.