Second Circuit· 6/18/2007
Iqbal v. Hasty
Citations
- 490 F.3d 143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Bell Atlantic requires a flexible “plausibility standard” that neither limited the subject matter to antitrust nor did it create a heightened pleading standard
- noting that the Supreme Court in Twombly “explicitly disavowed” 31 the “no set of facts” standard
- determining that Iqbal’s excessive-force claim — premised on supervisor liability — did not require Iqbal to plead “subsidiary facts” concerning the warden’s knowledge because “it [was] at least plausible that a warden would know of mistreatment inflicted by those under his command”
- assuming the existence of a Bivens remedy to challenge strip searches under the Fourth Amendment
- requiring a plaintiff who seeks to establish personal involvement by a defendant official “to amplify [his] claim with some factual allegations in those contexts where such 21 amplification is needed to render the claim plausible”
- expressing concern that “allowing some of the Plaintiffs claims to survive a motion to dismiss might facilitate the very type of broad-ranging discovery and litigation burdens that the qualified immunity privilege was intended to prevent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Cabranes, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
413 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyThird Circuit· 2008-02-05· cited 8,116×
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesTenth Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 3,738×
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court· 2017-06-19· cited 2,879×
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 2,369×
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichSeventh Circuit· 2008-05-27· cited 1,583×
- Darnell v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2017-02-21· cited 1,487×
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-04-09· cited 1,176×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2007-08-03· cited 1,068×
- Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C.Tenth Circuit· 2007-07-13· cited 646×
- Boykin v. KeyCorpSecond Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 619×
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2009-09-03· cited 576×
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 573×
- Pettus v. MorgenthauSecond Circuit· 2009-01-28· cited 567×
- Walczyk v. RioSecond Circuit· 2007-08-01· cited 426×
- Harden-Bey v. RutterSixth Circuit· 2008-05-12· cited 406×
- In Re Elevator Antitrust LitigationSecond Circuit· 2007-09-04· cited 400×
- McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.Federal Circuit· 2007-09-14· cited 385×
- Marion v. Columbia Correctional InstitutionSeventh Circuit· 2009-03-23· cited 377×
- Turkmen v. AshcroftSecond Circuit· 2009-12-18· cited 374×
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 13,305×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 6,491×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,877×
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 3,211×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 2,748×
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,725×
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court· 1998-05-04· cited 2,583×
Other cases named Iqbal v. Hasty
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.