Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Second Circuit· 8/1/2007

Walczyk v. Rio

Citations

  • 496 F.3d 139
  • 2007 WL 2199005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an arrest pursuant to a warrant is presumed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that an arrest pursuant to a warrant is presumed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that an arrest pursuant to a warrant is presumed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that an arrest pursuant to a warrant is presumed to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that whether a “reasonable officer” would have drawn the correct conclusion from a piece of evidence was a question of fact that precluded summary judgment on qualified immunity
  • observing that, if illegality of conduct would not be apparent to reasonable officer, defendant is entitled to immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Sotomayor, Raggi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

163 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Walczyk v. Rio

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.