Supreme Court· 5/4/1998

Crawford-El v. Britton

Citations

523 U.S. 574
118 S. Ct. 1584
140 L. Ed. 2d 759
1998 U.S. LEXIS 2966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a non-movant carries its burden on summary judgment only by “identify[ing] affirmative evidence” which creates a genuine dispute of material fact
holding that correction officer’s misdirection of inmate’s personal belongings may constitute a claim of retaliation for exercise of First Amendment rights
holding that a prisoner bringing a § 1983 action against government official need not present clear and convincing evidence of official’s improper motive in order to defeat official’s motion for summary judgment
holding that the non-movant must “identify affirmative evidence” which creates a genuine dispute of material fact
holding that the non-movant must “identify affirmative evidence” which creates a genuine dispute of material fact
holding that a non-movant carries its burden on summary judgment only by “identifying] affirmative evidence” which creates a genuine dispute of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Kennedy, Soüter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

892 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Crawford-El v. Britton

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.