Pettus v. Morgenthau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there must be some nexus between the alleged imminent danger and the legal claims in the complaint
• holding that § 1915(g) requires a nexus between the imminent danger the prisoner alleges and the claims he asserts
• holding that there must be some nexus between the alleged imminent danger and the legal claims in the complaint
• holding that there must be some nexus between the imminent danger alleged by the prisoner and the legal claims asserted in his complaint
• holding that “there must be a nexus between the imminent danger a three-strikes prisoner alleges to obtain IFP status and the legal claims asserted in his complaint”
• holding that “there must be a nexus between the imminent danger a three-strikes prisoner alleges to obtain IFP status and the legal claims asserted in his complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).