Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 10/23/2009

In re Sealed Case

Citations

  • 393 U.S. App. D.C. 150
  • 624 F.3d 482
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29281
  • 2010 WL 4138553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of Rule 60(b) motion in a lack-of-notice case where appellant was not allowed to review a sealed docket despite written and oral inquiries to the clerk of the court
  • 180-day deadline for reopening the time to file an appeal is not subject to equitable exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanaugh, Rogers, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.