Baltia Air Lines, Inc. v. Transaction Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Rule 60(b) is \an appropriate vehicle by which to challenge a judgment confirming an arbitration award\
• holding that parties “cannot circumvent the limitations” on filing a motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(3) “by relying on the catchall provision of 60(b)(6)”
• noting that examples of fraud on the court include “the knowing participation of an attorney in the presentation of perjured testimony.”
• noting that “Rule 60(b) is an appropriate vehicle by which to challenge a judgment confirming an arbitration award”
• stating that “Rule 60 (b) is an appropriate vehicle by which to challenge a judgment confirming an arbitration award”
• stating that fraud on the court is fraud that “is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).