Clark v. Lavallie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) cannot be used to circumvent Rule 4(a)(6)
• “[N]othing within Rule 4(a)(6) indicates it is permissive or that its limitations may be waived for equitable reasons.”
• rejecting pro se prisoner’s motion filed more than 180 days after entry of judgment
• \Rules 4(a)(6) and 77(d) ‘precludes the use of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) to cure problems of lack of notice.’\ (citations omitted)
• “Rules 4(a)(6) and 77(d) ‘preclude[] the use of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) to cure problems of lack of notice.’” (citations omitted)
• “We also agree the specificity of Rules 4(a)(6) and 77(d) ‘precludes the use of Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) to cure problems of lack of notice.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).