Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/15/2016

Washington v. Ryan

Citations

  • 833 F.3d 1087
  • 2016 WL 4269871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) “authorizes an ‘outer time limit’ of 180 days to move for an extension of time to file an appeal ... [and a] district court may not otherwise relieve parties from failing to file a timely appeal due solely to lack of notice of judgment”
  • “Of the thousands of judgments entered by district courts each year, only a handful have been found to warrant this type of relief.”
  • “[W]here other factors counsel relief, a calendaring mistake and related 7 failure to catch that mistake is no bar to Rule 60(b)(1) relief.”
  • “The filing deadline in Rule 4(a)(1) is mandatory and jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Fletcher, Rawlinson, Clifton, Bybee, Callahan, Bea, Smith, Ikuta, Christen, Watford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Washington v. Ryan

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.