Mobley v. Central Intelligence Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the FBI’s search was adequate in part because plaintiff “provide[d] no evidence that the FBI was aware” of leads plaintiff identified in another agency’s documents “before [the FBI] complet[ed] its search.”
• concluding that the FBI’s search was adequate in part because plaintiff “provide[d] no evidence that the FBI was aware” of leads plaintiff identified in another agency’s documents “before [the FBI] complet[ed] its search.”
• holding that \simple clerical mistake in FOIA processing\ is not official acknowledgement
• holding that “simple clerical mistake in FOIA processing” is not official acknowledgement
• noting that a search may be adequate even if it does not identify all relevant material
• noting that a search may be adequate even if it does not identify all relevant material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).