Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 12/11/1950

Ackermann v. United States

Citations

  • 340 U.S. 193
  • 71 S. Ct. 209
  • 95 L. Ed. 2d 207
  • 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1315
  • 95 L. Ed. 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitioners were not entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 (b) when they made a “free, calculated, deliberate choic[e]” not to appeal
  • holding that Rule 60(b)(6) relief from allegedly erroneous judgment was unavailable for petitioner who made “voluntary, deliberate, free, untrammeled choice ... not to appeal”
  • holding that party's failure to appeal original judgment weighs heavily against party's ability to set the judgment aside at a later date under Rule 60(b)
  • ruling that strategic decisions made during course of litigation, that upon reconsideration appear to be erroneous, do not provide basis for relief under Rule 60(b)
  • holding that knowing failure to appeal is not excused by Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) even though companion case was appealed successfully
  • holding that knowing failure to appeal is not excused by Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) even though companion case was appealed successfully

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minton, Black, Clark, Frankfurter, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

838 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ackermann v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.