Zimmer St. Louis, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Zimmer Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Donald Beaty, Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding in the Rule 60(b) context that failure to receive notice of final judgment did not warrant relief, absent evidence that the official docket failed to reflect entry of final judgment
• concluding in the Rule 60(b) context that failure to receive notice of final judgment did not warrant relief, absent evidence that the official docket failed to reflect entry of final judgment
• “[T]he plain language of both Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 77(d) addresses specifically the problem of lack of notice of a final judgment.”
• “[T]he plain language of both Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 77(d) addresses specifically the problem of lack of notice of a final judgment.”
• aggrieved party could not obtain relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6
• “It is our view that [Appellate Rule 4(a)(6)] was designed to respond to the circumstances that had prompted courts to use Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) to circumvent the deadlines specified by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5). Other courts and commentators have so concluded as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).