· 3/9/1993
Douglas S. Lewis v. George Alexander
Citations
- 987 F.2d 392
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 47
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4297
- 1993 WL 59289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the the district court retains jurisdiction when the appeal is untimely, presents issues that the appellate court had previously decided in the same case, or is from a non-final, non-appealable order
- “[A] district court may not act sua sponte to grant relief from judgment through Rule 60(b).”
- “[T]he district court retains jurisdiction over an action when an appeal is untimely, is an appeal from a non-appealable non-final order, or raises only issues that were previously ruled upon in that case by the appellate court.” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
- applying Rodgers to a non lack-of-notice case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Boggs, Contie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.