California Supreme Court· 8/31/1992

In Re Jackson

Citations

835 P.2d 371
3 Cal. 4th 578
11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 531
92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7581
92 Daily Journal DAR 12344
1992 Cal. LEXIS 4145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Accordingly, we conclude that because the prose- cution should have known of the false and misleading nature of the informants’ testimony, the prosecution was under a constitutional obligation to correct that testimony.”
discussing, inter alia, Brady, Giglio, and Barbee
discussing, inter alia, Brady, Giglio, and Barbee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George, Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Jackson

246 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.