In Re Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unlike federal approach, due process analysis under California constitution involves assessment of the procedural protections required in light of the interests at stake
• unlike federal approach, due process analysis under California constitution involves assessment of the procedural protections required in light of the interests at stake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Malinda S.
  California Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 210×
• Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego Section
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-12-24· cited 74×
• Davenport v. Department of Motor Vehicles
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-04-08· cited 53×
• Conway v. Cumming
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-09· cited 29×
• People v. Sanchez
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-04-05· cited 21×
• In Re Walter E.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-05-21· cited 18×
• In Re Rothwell
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-06-23· cited 16×
• Coniglio v. Department of Motor Vehicles
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-10-25· cited 16×
• In Re Donald R.
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-10-20· cited 15×
• In Re Dikes
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-08-17· cited 7×
• In Re Estrada
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-07-16· cited 7×
• Marquez v. Guttierez
  E.D. California· 1999-06-04· cited 3×
• Department of Social Services v. Ernestine A.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-05-21· cited 2×
• San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Rusell S.
  California Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 1×
• Sacramento County Department of Social Services v. William G.
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-10-20· cited 1×
• In re Kavanaugh
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-02-25

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Wolff v. McDonnell
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
• Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 4,010×
• Hewitt v. Helms
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,877×
• Olim v. Wakinekona
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 3,076×
• Baxter v. Palmigiano
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
• Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-09-30· cited 960×
• Ponte v. Real
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 708×
• Avant v. Clifford
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-06-23· cited 276×
• People v. Ramirez
  California Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 213×
• Charles Mendoza v. Harold G. Miller, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-12-19· cited 135×
• Jackson v. Carlson
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-05-12· cited 132×
• Paul Ivan Birzon, in Behalf of Morris Satz v. Edward S. King, United States Marshal and Hon. Michael A. Amico, Sheriff of Erie County
  Second Circuit· 1972-12-06· cited 97×
• Toussaint v. McCarthy
  N.D. California· 1984-10-18· cited 93×
• Charles Smith v. Fulton Rabalais, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-10-15· cited 92×
• Gerald McCollum Clifton C. Piggie-Bey, Harry L. Greene-El, and Reynaldo Ramirez-Rodriguez v. Harold Miller, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-03-22· cited 90×
• McGinnis v. Stevens
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 87×
• John Wesley Clutchette v. Raymond J. Procunier
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-07-29· cited 85×
• Nicholas A. Palmigiano v. Joseph Baxter
  First Circuit· 1973-11-16· cited 84×
• Nelson v. Commissioner of Correction
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-11-10· cited 84×
• Fred Kyle v. Jack Hanberry and Norman Carlson
  Eleventh Circuit· 1982-06-11· cited 66×