Skip to main content
· 8/17/2006

People v. Ledesma

Citations

  • 140 P.3d 657
  • 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 326
  • 39 Cal. 4th 641
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 10936
  • 2006 Cal. LEXIS 9521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the words “willful, deliberate, and premeditated” in a murder statute are not unconstitutionally vague because they “can be readily understood and applied”
  • finding nothing improper about the prosecutor questioning defense witnesses about the defendant's motive to plead guilty to rebut defendant's claim that he pled guilty to accept responsibility
  • affirming the trial court’s decision to allow a police officer to testify as to his prior conversation with a witness after that witness testified that he could not remember the conversation
  • finding nothing improper about the prosecutor questioning defense witnesses about the defendant’s motive to plead guilty to rebut defendant’s claim that he pled guilty to accept responsibility
  • affirming the trial court’s decision to allow a police officer to testify as to his prior conversation with a witness after that witness testified that he could not remember the conversation
  • affirming the trial court's decision to allow a police officer to testify as to his prior conversation with a witness after that witness testified that he could not remember the conversation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.