· 8/17/2006
People v. Ledesma
Citations
- 140 P.3d 657
- 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 326
- 39 Cal. 4th 641
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 10936
- 2006 Cal. LEXIS 9521
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the words “willful, deliberate, and premeditated” in a murder statute are not unconstitutionally vague because they “can be readily understood and applied”
- finding nothing improper about the prosecutor questioning defense witnesses about the defendant's motive to plead guilty to rebut defendant's claim that he pled guilty to accept responsibility
- affirming the trial court’s decision to allow a police officer to testify as to his prior conversation with a witness after that witness testified that he could not remember the conversation
- finding nothing improper about the prosecutor questioning defense witnesses about the defendant’s motive to plead guilty to rebut defendant’s claim that he pled guilty to accept responsibility
- affirming the trial court’s decision to allow a police officer to testify as to his prior conversation with a witness after that witness testified that he could not remember the conversation
- affirming the trial court's decision to allow a police officer to testify as to his prior conversation with a witness after that witness testified that he could not remember the conversation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.