N.D. Illinois· 1/22/1992
In Re Jackson
Citations
- 136 B.R. 797
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 63
- 1992 WL 29220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying section 1322(b)(2) protection where rents were not incidents of real property because Illinois law did not entitle mortgagee to rents unless pledged in the mortgage
- security interest in fixtures and insurance proceeds does not constitute additional security, but state law governs mortgagee's rights to rents
- a mortgage encumbering a two-flat unit, where the debtor lived in one unit and occasionally rented the other, was not protected
- “... [l]an-guage which goes beyond the traditional right to use proceeds to pay off the obligation ... may constitute the pledge of additional security.”
- \[T]he boilerplate language granting the mortgagee the right to receive and use property insurance proceeds in the event of some destruction of the property does not create an additional type of collateral securing the mortgage obligation.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erwin I. Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Iris June Davis, Debtor. Allied Credit Corporation v. Iris June DavisSixth Circuit· 1993-03-24· cited 46×
- Adebanjo v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (In Re Adebanjo)D. Connecticut· 1994-03-30· cited 32×
- In Re EscueM.D. Tennessee· 1995-05-01· cited 27×
- In Re RosenD. New Jersey· 1997-03-24· cited 23×
- In Re LegowskiD. Massachusetts· 1994-05-24· cited 22×
- Washington v. WashingtonFifth Circuit· 1992-08-04· cited 17×
- In Re AmersonS.D. Mississippi· 1992-07-29· cited 16×
- Miami Valley Bank v. Lutz (In Re Lutz)W.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-02-26· cited 12×
- Matter of GrahamN.D. Indiana· 1992-06-30· cited 11×
- In Re PruitteE.D. Missouri· 1993-08-16· cited 6×
- Akwa v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.D. Maryland· 2015-04-30· cited 4×
- In re ArnsN.D. Illinois· 2007-08-07· cited 4×
- Hernandez v. Union National Bank of Arkansas (In Re Hernandez)E.D. Texas· 1993-01-12· cited 1×
- RTC v. Alvin (In re Alvin)Fifth Circuit· 1992-08-04· cited 1×
- Matter of WashingtonFifth Circuit· 1992-07-31
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ronald E. Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings AssociationFirst Circuit· 1984-04-19· cited 213×
- Frank and Arlene Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage CorporationThird Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 137×
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 106×
- In Re Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. Hart, Debtors. Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. HartTenth Circuit· 1991-02-26· cited 91×
- First National Fidelity Corp. v. Ruth Perry, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeFirst Circuit· 1991-10-08· cited 80×
- Caster v. United States (In Re Caster)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-08-24· cited 45×
- In Re RamirezS.D. California· 1986-07-16· cited 40×
- De Kalb Bank v. PurdyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-02-11· cited 39×
- In Re KleinE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-10-19· cited 37×
- Home Savings Ass'n of Kansas City, F.A. v. Woodstock Associates I, Inc. (In Re Woodstock Associates I, Inc.)N.D. Illinois· 1990-10-24· cited 34×
- In Re RossW.D. Oklahoma· 1989-11-22· cited 26×
- In Re WilliamsE.D. New York· 1989-12-21· cited 26×
- Lyons v. First Pennsylvania Bank (In Re Lyons)N.D. Illinois· 1985-02-15· cited 23×
- Wright v. C & S Family Credit, Inc. (In Re Wright)N.D. Georgia· 1991-05-07· cited 22×
- In Re DiquinzioD. Rhode Island· 1990-02-14· cited 20×
- In Re ReevesN.D. Illinois· 1986-10-07· cited 16×
- Taylor v. OsmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1926-03-03· cited 16×
- In Re WilsonW.D. Missouri· 1988-09-27· cited 15×
- In Re HouglandD. Oregon· 1988-12-12· cited 15×
- Transouth Financial Corp. v. HillW.D. Tennessee· 1989-07-20· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.