Jackson v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, in the context of nondisclosure of evidence, “investigative officers are part of the prosecution” (citations omitted)
• observing that the materiality standard for a Brady claim is more stringent than for a Napue claim
• observing that, in the context of nondisclosure of evidence, “investigative officers are part of the prosecution” (citations omitted)
• describing the different standards and explaining the process for analyzing Brady and Napue errors in tandem
• describing the different standards and explaining the process for analyzing Brady and Napue errors in tandem
• finding Napue materiality because revealing a key witness’s “obvious willingness to lie under oath” would have “cast doubt on his entire testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).