Fifth Circuit· 1/8/2015
In re Jackson
Citations
- 776 F.3d 292
- 2015 WL 127370
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the Supreme Court has not made Johnson 2010 retroactive
- denying authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion because Descamps did not announce a new rule of law retroactively applicable on collateral review
- “Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review.”
- “Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review.”
- “Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review.”
- noting in the context of an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion that Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elrod, Haynes, Prado
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re: Marvin GriffinEleventh Circuit· 2016-05-25· cited 87×
- In re: Dequintan ArnickFifth Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 26×
- United States v. Robinson (In Re Robinson)Fifth Circuit· 2019-03-08· cited 16×
- United States v. LadwigE.D. Washington· 2016-06-28· cited 13×
- United States v. Dwayne MorganFifth Circuit· 2017-01-12· cited 6×
- King v. United StatesS.D. Florida· 2016-08-24· cited 3×
- United States v. Jesus Montalvo DavilaFifth Circuit· 2018-05-16· cited 1×
- Leone v. United StatesS.D. Florida· 2017-02-02· cited 1×
- Vanbuhler v. United StatesE.D. Michigan· 2016-07-27
- King v. United StatesS.D. Florida· 2017-02-02
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 2,997×
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 2,419×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-03-02· cited 1,738×
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 1,437×
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,437×
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 948×
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court· 2003-03-25· cited 823×
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 822×
- O'Dell v. NetherlandSupreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 521×
- Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - MediumEleventh Circuit· 2013-12-24· cited 142×
- Devon Groves v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2014-06-19· cited 142×
- Welch v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2010-05-04· cited 109×
- In Re: Cecil BradfordFifth Circuit· 2011-10-07· cited 81×
- Ricky Jones v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2012-07-31· cited 81×
- Herbert Rozier v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2012-11-21· cited 46×
- In Re: TatumFifth Circuit· 2000-11-15· cited 43×
- Damon v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2013-10-03· cited 40×
- In Re: SmithFifth Circuit· 1998-05-29· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.