Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/8/2015

In re Jackson

Citations

  • 776 F.3d 292
  • 2015 WL 127370
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that the Supreme Court has not made Johnson 2010 retroactive
  • denying authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion because Descamps did not announce a new rule of law retroactively applicable on collateral review
  • “Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review.”
  • “Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review.”
  • “Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review.”
  • noting in the context of an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion that Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collateral review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elrod, Haynes, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.