In Re Hanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Form B22C controls unless “special circumstances” can be shown under § 707(b)(2)(B)
• noting that Congress simply chose a different method of projecting a return to unsecured creditors
• finding a job loss and lower income at new employment do not constitute special circumstances
• “a harsh or even illogical result is not the same thing as an absurd result”
• “projected” should not be elevated in importance so as to gut the new statutory scheme
• “The statutory examples of serious medical condition and active military service, although not exhaustive, are instructive of the kinds of ‘special circumstance’ that would justify deviations from Form B22C under the principal of ejusdem gen-eris.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 97×
• Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-11-13· cited 77×
• In Re McGillis
  W.D. Michigan· 2007-05-15· cited 52×
• In Re Kolb
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-03-30· cited 50×
• In Re Henebury
  S.D. Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 50×
• Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-07· cited 44×
• In Re Williams
  D. Colorado· 2008-09-12· cited 40×
• In Re Miller
  N.D. Alabama· 2007-01-18· cited 40×
• In Re Austin
  D. Vermont· 2007-08-07· cited 37×
• In Re Cribbs
  S.D. Georgia· 2008-05-01· cited 23×
• In Re Meek
  D. Idaho· 2007-06-27· cited 22×
• Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)
  E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
• In Re Arsenault
  M.D. Florida· 2007-07-03· cited 20×
• In Re Spurgeon
  E.D. Tennessee· 2007-10-10· cited 20×
• In Re Lawson
  D. Utah· 2007-01-25· cited 19×
• Mancl v. Chatterton (In Re Mancl)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2008-02-12· cited 19×
• In Re Wilson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
• In Re Davis
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-07-22· cited 16×
• In Re DeThample
  D. Kansas· 2008-07-24· cited 16×
• In Re Tauter
  M.D. Florida· 2009-02-24· cited 13×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Chickasaw Nation v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 405×
• Dole v. United Steelworkers
  Supreme Court· 1990-02-21· cited 352×
• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In Re Alexander
  E.D. North Carolina· 2006-06-30· cited 153×
• In Re Jass
  D. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
• In Re Farrar-Johnson
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-09-15· cited 105×
• In Re Edmunds
  D. South Carolina· 2005-09-18· cited 79×
• In Re Guzman
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-07-19· cited 53×
• In Re Grady
  N.D. Georgia· 2006-06-21· cited 47×
• In Re Kibbe
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-04-14· cited 42×
• In Re Fuller
  S.D. Illinois· 2006-06-21· cited 41×
• In Re Fuger
  D. Utah· 2006-06-29· cited 39×
• In Re Rotunda
  N.D. New York· 2006-09-01· cited 38×
• In Re Ott
  D. Colorado· 2006-04-12· cited 23×
• In Re LaSota
  W.D. New York· 2006-09-19· cited 19×
• In Re Ludwig
  D. Colorado· 2006-05-11· cited 12×
• Redmond v. Lentz & Clark, P.A. (In Re Wagers)
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-11-28· cited 10×
• In Re Diagostino
  N.D. New York· 2006-08-28· cited 5×