In Re Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Prior to the bankruptcy amendments, Schedules I and J were the primary source of evidence used to satisfy the disposable income test under § 1325(b). Upon objection to confirmation under § 1325(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Maney v. Kagenveama
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-23· cited 131×
• Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-11-13· cited 77×
• In Re Henebury
  S.D. Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 50×
• In Re Swan
  N.D. California· 2007-04-18· cited 45×
• In Re Haman
  D. Delaware· 2007-04-20· cited 41×
• In Re Brady
  D. New Jersey· 2007-02-13· cited 41×
• In Re Austin
  D. Vermont· 2007-08-07· cited 37×
• In Re Howell
  D. Kansas· 2007-04-26· cited 27×
• In Re Cribbs
  S.D. Georgia· 2008-05-01· cited 23×
• Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)
  E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
• In Re Arsenault
  M.D. Florida· 2007-07-03· cited 20×
• In Re Spurgeon
  E.D. Tennessee· 2007-10-10· cited 20×
• In Re Puetz
  D. Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 19×
• In Re Wilson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
• In Re Armstrong
  E.D. Washington· 2007-06-12· cited 18×
• In Re Berger
  M.D. Georgia· 2007-06-11· cited 16×
• In Re DeThample
  D. Kansas· 2008-07-24· cited 16×
• In Re Turner
  S.D. Indiana· 2008-03-27· cited 14×
• Maney v. Kagenveama
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 14×
• In Re Ross
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-09-13· cited 13×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In Re Alexander
  E.D. North Carolina· 2006-06-30· cited 153×
• In Re Farrar-Johnson
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-09-15· cited 105×
• In Re Barr
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-04-05· cited 93×
• In Re Edmunds
  D. South Carolina· 2005-09-18· cited 79×
• In Re Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2006-10-13· cited 55×
• In Re Guzman
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-07-19· cited 53×
• In Re Haley
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-10-18· cited 49×
• In Re Hanks
  D. Utah· 2007-01-09· cited 49×
• In Re Grady
  N.D. Georgia· 2006-06-21· cited 47×
• In Re Kibbe
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-04-14· cited 42×
• In Re Grunert
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-11-20· cited 38×
• In Re Rotunda
  N.D. New York· 2006-09-01· cited 38×
• In Re Casey
  E.D. Washington· 2006-10-27· cited 38×
• In Re Love
  M.D. Alabama· 2006-08-30· cited 32×
• In Re Dew
  N.D. Alabama· 2006-06-21· cited 31×
• In Re Gress
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-06-14· cited 30×