D. Colorado· 9/12/2008
In Re Williams
Citations
- 394 B.R. 550
- 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2394
- 2008 WL 4369261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the good faith test should be used to ferret out those debtors who attempt to manipulate the Code
- adopting a monetary approach to the applicable commitment period because it “allows the possibility that a debtor will pay 11 We do not address in this opinion the full scope of the good faith requirement in § 1325(a)(3) and how it interacts with § 1325(b
- “[Section] 1325(a)(3) allows for a more subjective 11 analysis of a debtor’s good faith and the totality of the circumstances, even where the debtor has met the mechanical 12 requirements of § 1325(b).”
- “Section 707(b)(2)(A)(iv) allows an above-median income debtor to subtract all priority claims in arriving at PDI. Such deductible priority claims must include those expenses given administrative expense priority by § 503.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elizabeth E. Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baud v. CarrollFifth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 69×
- In re: David C. Welsh and Sharon N. WelshNinth Circuit· 2012-02-17· cited 42×
- Carroll v. SandersSixth Circuit· 2008-12-29· cited 23×
- Danielson v. Flores (In Re Flores)Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 15×
- In Re StittD. Idaho· 2008-11-07· cited 12×
- In Re HieterD. Idaho· 2009-03-13· cited 10×
- In Re MooseE.D. Virginia· 2009-11-12· cited 10×
- In Re KearneyE.D. Wisconsin· 2010-12-03· cited 10×
- In Re ForbishN.D. Illinois· 2009-05-05· cited 9×
- In Re JohnsonW.D. Missouri· 2009-07-06· cited 5×
- VIEGELAHN v. EssexW.D. Texas· 2011-06-27· cited 5×
- In Re MainsW.D. Michigan· 2011-05-25· cited 5×
- In re CormierD. Massachusetts· 2012-09-27· cited 5×
- In Re WingD. Colorado· 2010-09-09· cited 4×
- In Re Chicago Investments, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2012-04-24· cited 4×
- In re MartinC.D. Illinois· 2012-01-24· cited 4×
- In re ColonN.D. Illinois· 2016-12-29· cited 4×
- In Re ArrigoD. Colorado· 2008-12-04· cited 3×
- In re WiseDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-16· cited 2×
- In re TrobianoD. Colorado· 2015-06-23· cited 2×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 334×
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeNinth Circuit· 1982-05-03· cited 259×
- Gordon R. And Sharon L. Flygare, Debtors-Appellants v. Judith A. BouldenTenth Circuit· 1983-06-01· cited 183×
- In Re AlexanderE.D. North Carolina· 2006-06-30· cited 153×
- In Re JassD. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
- Maney v. KagenveamaNinth Circuit· 2008-06-23· cited 131×
- In Re SlusherD. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
- In Re Farrar-JohnsonN.D. Illinois· 2006-09-15· cited 105×
- In Re Robert Arlin Gier, Debtor-Appellant, Robert Arlin Gier v. Farmers State Bank of Lucas, KansasTenth Circuit· 1993-02-05· cited 103×
- Kibbe v. SumskiFirst Circuit· 2007-02-20· cited 103×
- In Re BarrM.D. North Carolina· 2006-04-05· cited 93×
- In Re EdmundsD. South Carolina· 2005-09-18· cited 79×
- Mason v. YoungTenth Circuit· 2001-01-16· cited 74×
- In Re Elmer Claire Rasmussen. Pioneer Bank of Longmont, Creditor-Appellant v. Elmer Claire Rasmussen, Debtor-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1989-11-01· cited 62×
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 55×
- In Re McGillisW.D. Michigan· 2007-05-15· cited 52×
- In Re LanningTenth Circuit· 2007-12-13· cited 50×
- In Re NanceS.D. Illinois· 2007-07-10· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.