In Re Fuger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• debtors are not required to have a 60 month plan where their disposal income is negative
• “The Court believes that the manifest intent of Congress underlying § 1325(b)(1)(B) is ... to require debtors to commit to a specific return to unsecured creditors.”
• it is in part temporal and in part monetary; intended to insure fixed return to unsecured creditors
• all holding the “applicable commitment period” is a multiplier that is applied to disposable income to determine the amount to be paid to unsecured creditors
• “The Court determines that the term ‘applicable commitment period’ requires the Debtors only to commit to a specific return to unsecured creditors, not to a specific period of time.”
• both a monetary and temporal provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).