D. Utah· 6/29/2006
In Re Fuger
Citations
- 347 B.R. 94
- 56 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 475
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1198
- 2006 WL 2389688
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- debtors are not required to have a 60 month plan where their disposal income is negative
- “The Court believes that the manifest intent of Congress underlying § 1325(b)(1)(B) is ... to require debtors to commit to a specific return to unsecured creditors.”
- it is in part temporal and in part monetary; intended to insure fixed return to unsecured creditors
- all holding the “applicable commitment period” is a multiplier that is applied to disposable income to determine the amount to be paid to unsecured creditors
- “The Court determines that the term ‘applicable commitment period’ requires the Debtors only to commit to a specific return to unsecured creditors, not to a specific period of time.”
- both a monetary and temporal provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William T. Thurman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re SlusherD. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
- Baud v. CarrollFifth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 69×
- In Re McGillisW.D. Michigan· 2007-05-15· cited 52×
- In Re KolbS.D. Ohio· 2007-03-30· cited 50×
- In Re HanksD. Utah· 2007-01-09· cited 49×
- In Re SwanN.D. California· 2007-04-18· cited 45×
- In Re BradyD. New Jersey· 2007-02-13· cited 41×
- In Re WilliamsD. Colorado· 2008-09-12· cited 40×
- In Re CaseyE.D. Washington· 2006-10-27· cited 38×
- In Re DavisE.D. Michigan· 2006-08-21· cited 31×
- In Re MurrayS.D. Ohio· 2006-09-13· cited 23×
- In Re MeekD. Idaho· 2007-06-27· cited 22×
- Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
- In Re LawsonD. Utah· 2007-01-25· cited 19×
- In Re MullenD. Oregon· 2007-05-14· cited 18×
- In Re WilsonM.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
- In Re MathisN.D. Illinois· 2007-05-04· cited 17×
- In Re DavisE.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-07-22· cited 16×
- Danielson v. Flores (In Re Flores)Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 15×
- In Re MartinD. Utah· 2007-05-08· cited 15×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 919×
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court· 1986-03-24· cited 763×
- Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 655×
- United States v. Congress of Industrial OrganizationsSupreme Court· 1948-06-21· cited 179×
- United States v. RLCSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 169×
- In Re JassD. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
- Morse v. Republican Party of VirginiaSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 141×
- In Re McGuireW.D. Missouri· 2006-06-01· cited 93×
- Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
- In Re PakN.D. California· 2006-05-18· cited 50×
- In Re SchanuthW.D. Missouri· 2006-05-25· cited 48×
- In Re GradyN.D. Georgia· 2006-06-21· cited 47×
- In Re KibbeD. New Hampshire· 2006-04-14· cited 42×
- Concepcion Padilla-Caldera v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralTenth Circuit· 2006-06-19· cited 33×
- Mason v. Young (In Re Young)Tenth Circuit· 1999-08-25· cited 26×
- In Re RichardsonD. Kansas· 2002-10-08· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.