E.D. Pennsylvania· 7/22/2008
In Re Davis
Citations
- 392 B.R. 132
- 60 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1001
- 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2393
- 2008 WL 2858437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “in allowing earlier repayment in full, Congress was increasing the opportunity for debtors to receive a bankruptcy discharge and a fresh start: one of the underlying purposes of the Bankruptcy Code.”
- outlining cases that are divided on whether the “applicable commitment period” is a monetary or temporal requirement
- outlining cases that are divided on whether the “applicable commitment period” is a monetary or temporal requirement
- outlining cases that are divided on whether the “applicable commitment period” is a monetary or temporal requirement
- outlining cases that are divided on how to calculate a debtor’s “projected disposable income”
- assuming for the sake of argument that the applicable commitment period imposes a temporal requirement and holding that, if so, it does not apply to debtors with zero or negative projected disposable income
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruce Fox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Eighth Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 97×
- Baud v. CarrollFifth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 69×
- Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
- Dehart v. Lopatka (In Re Lopatka)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-02-17· cited 18×
- In Re EganE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-08-30· cited 13×
- In Re JohnsonW.D. Missouri· 2009-07-06· cited 5×
- In Re VidalM.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-10-12· cited 4×
- Solar Innovations, Inc. v. Plevyak (In re Plevyak)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-05-24· cited 3×
- In re HinkleM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-07-02· cited 1×
- In re BallewE.D. North Carolina· 2013-01-11· cited 1×
- Richard Baud v. Krispen S. CarrollSixth Circuit· 2011-02-04
- David D. Coop v. Craig FredericksonEighth Circuit· 2008-10-27
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 1,290×
- In Re HardacreN.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
- In Re AlexanderE.D. North Carolina· 2006-06-30· cited 153×
- Maney v. KagenveamaNinth Circuit· 2008-06-23· cited 131×
- In Re SlusherD. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
- Kibbe v. SumskiFirst Circuit· 2007-02-20· cited 103×
- In Re Ralph E. Taylor, Debtor. Ralph E. TaylorThird Circuit· 1996-04-03· cited 101×
- Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 55×
- In Re David Michael Freeman and Genevieve Bizzell Freeman, Debtors. Genevieve Bizzell Freeman v. Suzanne C. Schulman, TrusteeSixth Circuit· 1996-06-27· cited 50×
- In Re LanningTenth Circuit· 2007-12-13· cited 50×
- Meyer v. Hill (In Re Hill)Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 50×
- In Re NanceS.D. Illinois· 2007-07-10· cited 49×
- In Re HanksD. Utah· 2007-01-09· cited 49×
- In Re SchanuthW.D. Missouri· 2006-05-25· cited 48×
- In Re SwanN.D. California· 2007-04-18· cited 45×
- Fridley v. Forsythe (In Re Fridley)Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-18· cited 43×
- In Re BradyD. New Jersey· 2007-02-13· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.