Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “if none of the subsection’s provisions are relevant to a debtor’s situations, then that subsection does not apply”
• finding that a debtor who has a housing or transportation expense, may include the full amount of the IRS Local Standards for those expense categories, even when his actual expenses are less than those amounts
• discussing the “significant divide” among courts regarding application of the Local Standards; though there are “only two basic outcomes, numerous distinct rationales and nuances arise within both lines of cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).