N.D. Georgia· 6/21/2006
In Re Grady
Citations
- 343 B.R. 747
- 56 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 619
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1121
- 2006 WL 1689324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in arriving at projected disposable income, “one simply takes the calculation mandated by § 1325(b)(2
- finding that flexibility in determining disposable income is consistent with a debt- or’s ability to amend his plan
- noting that the CMI figure is useful as an “estimate,” but that a court should evaluate a debtor’s past and current financial status to determine disposable income
- debtor’s heart condition prevented her from working and thus reduced her actual monthly income
- finding income should be considered at the time of confirmation
- “It is not logical for BAPCPA to limit a debtor to a plan based upon disposable income averaged over the six months preceding the petition date, when the debtor’s financial condition is dramatically different at the time of confirmation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: C. Ray Mullins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Eighth Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 97×
- In Re EdmundsD. South Carolina· 2005-09-18· cited 79×
- Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)Tenth Circuit· 2008-11-13· cited 77×
- In Re DevilliersE.D. Louisiana· 2007-01-09· cited 68×
- In Re BarrazaN.D. Texas· 2006-08-01· cited 56×
- In Re KolbS.D. Ohio· 2007-03-30· cited 50×
- In Re HanksD. Utah· 2007-01-09· cited 49×
- In Re CarlinD. Oregon· 2006-08-18· cited 49×
- In Re BradyD. New Jersey· 2007-02-13· cited 41×
- In Re MillerN.D. Alabama· 2007-01-18· cited 40×
- In Re FugerD. Utah· 2006-06-29· cited 39×
- In Re AustinD. Vermont· 2007-08-07· cited 37×
- In Re WatsonD. Maryland· 2007-04-11· cited 35×
- In Re SheltonN.D. Georgia· 2007-06-11· cited 31×
- In Re MeekD. Idaho· 2007-06-27· cited 22×
- In Re GirodesM.D. North Carolina· 2006-09-20· cited 21×
- In Re CarltonC.D. Illinois· 2007-02-28· cited 19×
- In Re MullenD. Oregon· 2007-05-14· cited 18×
- In Re WilsonM.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
- In Re SparksE.D. Texas· 2006-10-18· cited 17×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 5,972×
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 2,720×
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 1,739×
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 992×
- In Re Arthur R. Miller and Janet E. Miller, Debtors. Equitable Bank v. Arthur R. Miller, and Janet E. MillerEleventh Circuit· 1994-12-05· cited 290×
- In the Matter of Ron C. Cross, Bankrupt. Murphy & Robinson Investment Company v. Ron C. CrossFifth Circuit· 1982-02-01· cited 215×
- In Re HardacreN.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
- Rizalyn Bautista v. Star CruisesEleventh Circuit· 2005-01-18· cited 177×
- In Re JassD. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Francis W. Parker SchoolSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 66×
- In Re KibbeD. New Hampshire· 2006-04-14· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.