In Re Fuller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that income component of projected disposable income should be made with reference to Schedule I
• questioning the utility and fairness of freezing a debtor's income at a certain point in time where such a representation of income may not be accurate during the applicable commitment period
• Schedule I, as the actual income of a debtor, should be used to determine income
• “the word ‘projected,’ ... obviously has independent significance,” and so “the number resulting from Form B22C is a starting point for the Court’s inquiry only”
• projected disposable income to be determined by subtracting expenses from Schedule I

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Slusher
  D. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
• Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 97×
• In Re Edmunds
  D. South Carolina· 2005-09-18· cited 79×
• In Re Guzman
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-07-19· cited 53×
• In Re Kolb
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-03-30· cited 50×
• In Re Henebury
  S.D. Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 50×
• In Re Hanks
  D. Utah· 2007-01-09· cited 49×
• In Re Brady
  D. New Jersey· 2007-02-13· cited 41×
• In Re Rotunda
  N.D. New York· 2006-09-01· cited 38×
• In Re Casey
  E.D. Washington· 2006-10-27· cited 38×
• In Re Austin
  D. Vermont· 2007-08-07· cited 37×
• Hildebrand v. Petro (In Re Petro)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-10-17· cited 33×
• In Re Meek
  D. Idaho· 2007-06-27· cited 22×
• Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)
  E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
• Hildebrand v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-10-31· cited 20×
• In Re Carlton
  C.D. Illinois· 2007-02-28· cited 19×
• In Re Wilson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
• In Re Jewell
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-03-16· cited 16×
• In Re DeThample
  D. Kansas· 2008-07-24· cited 16×
• In Re Musselman
  E.D. North Carolina· 2007-11-30· cited 14×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In Re Jass
  D. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
• In Re McGuire
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-06-01· cited 93×
• In Re Barr
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-04-05· cited 93×
• In Re Pak
  N.D. California· 2006-05-18· cited 50×
• In Re Schanuth
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-05-25· cited 48×
• In Re Kibbe
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-04-14· cited 42×
• Leonard Alfred Rowley and Beverly Ann Rowley v. Rick A. Yarnall, Production Credit Association, and Farmers Home Administration
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-04-22· cited 36×
• In Re Renicker
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-05-11· cited 33×