Headlough v. Headlough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that master’s factual findings are binding unless clearly erroneous under Civil Rule 53(d)(2), but that master's recommendation as to proper course of action is not binding upon court
• trial court’s decision to increase child support payments pursuant to motion to modify divorce decree was deficient because the court included no findings of fact supporting its decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).