Skip to main content

Hughes v. State

Citations

  • 224 P.3d 515
  • 148 Idaho 448
  • 2009 Ida. App. LEXIS 103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel was satisfied by counsel advising defendant prior to the psycho-sexual evaluation being conducted
  • concluding that the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not require defense counsel’s physical presence at the psychosexual evaluation
  • in an Estrada case, the existence of prejudice is determined first and foremost from review of the PSE itself and court reference to its contents at the sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gratton, Lansing, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.