Roman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner had failed to show that the testimony of these witnesses would have raised a viable alibi defense to present to the jury
• ruling conclusory allegations unsupported by admissible evidence are insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact
• holding a sentencing claim barred because the petitioner “could have challenged the trial court’s reliance upon the allegedly outdated report in the course of sentencing through a direct appeal of the sentence”
• affirming summary dismissal where claims were based on conclusory allegations, unsupported by any fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).