State v. Schmidt
Citations
- 962 N.W.2d 612
- 2021 ND 137
Syllabus
Rule 32(c)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P., does not provide the district court with authority to order that defense counsel be allowed to be present for a psycho-sexual evaluation. The district court has no authority under section 12.1-01-04(26), N.D.C.C., to order the Department of Human Services to allow defense counsel to be present during such an evaluation. A defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is satisfied when defense counsel is given notice and an opportunity to consult with the defendant prior to the evaluation.
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 170×
- Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-04-13· cited 64×
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court· 1993-07-22· cited 45×
- Hughes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-10-14· cited 37×
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-01-26· cited 27×
- Dickinson Newspapers, Inc. v. JorgensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-08-04· cited 20×
- State v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-05-01· cited 11×
- State, ex rel. Madden v. RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-11-27· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.