Skip to main content

Esquivel v. State

Citations

  • 233 P.3d 186
  • 149 Idaho 255
  • 2010 Ida. App. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that access to the PSE is essential for the reviewing court to be able to determine if the defendant was prejudiced by the attorney’s deficient performance
  • in an Estrada case, access to the PSE is essential for the reviewing court to be able to determine if the defendant was prejudiced by the attorney’s deficient performance
  • in an Estrada case, access to the PSE is essential for the reviewing court to be able to determine if the defendant was prejudiced by the attorney’s deficient performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gutierrez, Gratton, Melanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.