Idaho Court of Appeals· 5/18/2011
State v. Hurst
Citations
- 258 P.3d 950
- 151 Idaho 430
- 2011 Ida. App. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 35(b) one motion limit applies to both oral and written motions
- holding that Rule 35(b) one motion limit applies to both oral and written motions
- noting the detective had not touched, handcuffed, or otherwise physically restrained Hurst in its holding that the defendant was not in custody for purposes of Miranda
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Gratton, Melanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Allen Keith ClontzIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-05-22· cited 18×
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-01-06· cited 17×
- State v. KentIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-11-10· cited 3×
- State v. ReillyIdaho Court of Appeals· 2021-12-15· cited 3×
- State v. Tennison M. SilverIdaho Court of Appeals· 2013-06-18· cited 2×
- State v. William F. WolfeIdaho Court of Appeals· 2013-10-08
- State v. WolfeIdaho Court of Appeals· 2013-11-14
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-01-05
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 1,098×
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 963×
- Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 848×
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2009-05-26· cited 668×
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 624×
- Russel William Burket v. Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsFourth Circuit· 2000-03-27· cited 320×
- United States v. BautistaTenth Circuit· 1998-05-22· cited 139×
- State v. MerwinIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-07-01· cited 98×
- United States v. Irvin Quinn HinesNinth Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 81×
- State v. MedranoIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-12-04· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.