Skip to main content

Clarke v. State

Citations

  • 928 S.W.2d 709
  • 1996 WL 447405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court could have determined that assertion of right to trial was weak where defendant “did not pursue his motion for a speedy trial” after filing it
  • concluding that trial court could have determined that assertion of right to trial was weak where defendant “did not pursue his motion for a speedy trial” after filing it and instead later “moved for dismissal”
  • finding some prejudice when convictions for two extraneous offenses became final during delay and thus became admissible at trial under prior version of code of criminal procedure article 37.07
  • finding some prejudice when convictions for two extraneous offenses became final during delay and thus became admissible at trial under prior version of code of criminal procedure article 37.07
  • finding some prejudice when convictions for two extraneous offenses became final during delay and thus became admissible at trial under prior version of code of criminal procedure article 37.07
  • requiring defendant show witness testimony would have been relevant and material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Livingston, Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.