Skip to main content

Eckert v. State

Citations

  • 623 S.W.2d 359
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mere mention of improper evidence did not warrant new trial when immediately followed by corrective instructions
  • mere mention of improper evidence did not warrant new trial when immediately followed by corrective instructions
  • mention of prior conviction with prompt instruction not to consider by jury foreman and no discussion did not require new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Eckert v. State

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.