Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/4/1985

Allen v. State

Citations

700 S.W.2d 924
1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that precursor to rule 412 was constitutional and did not, on its face, violate the accused’s 7 right to confrontation
holding that precursor to rule 412 was constitutional and did not, on its face, violate accused‘s right to confrontation
holding that precursor to Rule 412 was constitutional and did not, on its face, violate accused’s right to confrontation
holding that precursor to rule 412 was constitutional and did not, on its face, violate accused’s right to confrontation
holding that precursor to rule 412 was constitutional and did not, on its face, violate accused‘s right to confrontation
holding that precursor to rule 412 was constitutional and did not, on its face, violate the accused’s right to confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Teague, Miller, Clinton, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.