Skip to main content

May v. State

Citations

  • 738 S.W.2d 261
  • 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even where witnesses gave different version of events at trial than in pretrial statement, there was no abuse of discretion in denial of motion to take deposition
  • ADisproportionate representation in a single panel does not demonstrate the systematic exclusion of distinctive groups in violation of the appellant=s rights under the Sixth Amendment.@
  • \Disproportionate representation in a single panel does not demonstrate the systematic exclusion of distinctive groups in violation of the appellant's rights under the Sixth Amendment.\
  • State's failure to comply with discovery order did not rebut presumption of readiness
  • disproportionate representation on single jury panel does not demonstrate Sixth Amendment violation
  • no need for corroboration as to underlying offense of robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Miller, Teague, Clinton, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.