Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/8/2001
Heins v. Heins
Citations
- 543 S.E.2d 224
- 344 S.C. 146
- 2001 S.C. App. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating \the court must interpret contractual language in its natural and ordinary sense\
- “The court must enforce an unambiguous contract according to its terms, regardless of the contract’s wisdom or folly, or the parties’ failure to guard their rights carefully.”
- It is well settled that ordinarily a party may not receive relief not contemplated in his or her pleadings.
- [O]rdinarily a party may not receive relief not contemplated in his pleadings.
- “Unambiguous marital agreements will be enforced according to their terms.”
- \Unambiguous marital agreements will be enforced according to their terms.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Hearn, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-02-02· cited 110×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-14· cited 65×
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 49×
- Lanier v. LanierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 38×
- Miles v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-08-22· cited 30×
- Lacke v. LackeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-10· cited 28×
- Holler v. HollerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 27×
- Van Ness v. Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-06-27· cited 24×
- Nicholson v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-06· cited 22×
- York v. Dodgeland of Columbia, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-09-04· cited 15×
- Hardee v. HardeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-10· cited 13×
- Erie Insurance v. Winter Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-06-15· cited 12×
- Ward v. West Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 9×
- Wooten v. WootenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-05· cited 9×
- Park Regency, LLC v. R & D Development of the CarolinasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-11-28· cited 9×
- LaFrance v. LaFranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 6×
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-04-17· cited 5×
- Wooten v. WootenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 4×
- Wannamaker v. WannamakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-11· cited 1×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
- Lindsay v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 69×
- Useden v. AckerEleventh Circuit· 1991-12-11· cited 62×
- Badeaux v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 55×
- Murdock v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-20· cited 50×
- Ellis v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-09-19· cited 48×
- Superior Automobile Insurance v. ManersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-09-25· cited 48×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 44×
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-28· cited 37×
- Mable Y. Burnam v. Amoco Container CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1984-08-13· cited 33×
- Ebert v. EbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-06· cited 31×
- Dorchester County Department of Social Services v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 27×
- Bass v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-12-06· cited 24×
- Leviner v. Sonoco Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-04-03· cited 23×
- Marshall v. ShalalaTenth Circuit· 1993-06-30· cited 20×
- Terwilliger v. TerwilligerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-03-27· cited 18×
- Continental Laboratory Products, Inc. v. Medax International, Inc.S.D. California· 2000-09-18· cited 18×
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 16×
- Maryann H. Hidle v. Geneva County Board of EducationEleventh Circuit· 1986-07-03· cited 14×
- Southern Realty & Construction Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-09-29· cited 13×
Other cases named Heins v. Heins
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.