Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/6/2008
Nicholson v. Nicholson
Citations
- 663 S.E.2d 74
- 378 S.C. 523
- 2008 S.C. App. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that without an initial ruling by the trial court, an appellate court is unable to evaluate whether the trial court committed error
- holding when the family court did not rule on an issue at trial and the party did not make a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion, the issue is not preserved for appellate review
- stating an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the family court to be preserved on appeal, and if the family court does not rule on an issue and the appellant does not raise it in a Rule 59(e) motion, it is unpreserved
- stating an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the circuit court to be preserved on appeal, and if the circuit court does not rule on an issue and the appellant does not raise it in a Rule 59(e) motion, it is unpreserved
- stating an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved on appeal, and if the trial court does not rule on an issue and the appellant does not raise it in a Rule 59(e), SCRCP motion, it is unpreserved
- \A court approved divorce settlement must be viewed in accordance with principles of equity and there is implied in every such agreement a requirement of reasonableness.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Huff, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brown v. OdomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 32×
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-10-23· cited 16×
- Gaffney v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-12-28· cited 5×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 4×
- Keefer v. KeeferCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 2×
- Nestberg v. NestbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-31· cited 2×
- Nancy C. Fennell v. James M. FennellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2026-03-18
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-09· cited 665×
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
- Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-20· cited 172×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-03· cited 120×
- Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-02-02· cited 110×
- Wooten v. WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
- Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-25· cited 98×
- Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 91×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-01-13· cited 75×
- Lindsay v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 69×
- Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-14· cited 65×
- Griffith v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-10-12· cited 65×
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1983-11-07· cited 65×
- Lucas v. RAWL FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-03· cited 63×
- Shirley v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 63×
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.