Skip to main content
· 1/10/2005

Lacke v. Lacke

Citations

  • 608 S.E.2d 147
  • 362 S.C. 302
  • 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A contract is ambiguous when it is capable of more than one meaning or when its meaning is unclear.\ (quoting Smith–Cooper v. Cooper, 344 S.C. 289, 295, 543 S.E.2d 271, 274 (Ct. App. 2001))
  • \A contract is ambiguous when it is capable of more than one meaning or when its meaning is unclear.\ (quoting Smith-Cooper v. Cooper, 344 S.C. 289, 301, 543 S.E.2d 271, 277 (Ct. App. 2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Stilwell, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.