Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/10/2005
Lacke v. Lacke
Citations
- 608 S.E.2d 147
- 362 S.C. 302
- 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A contract is ambiguous when it is capable of more than one meaning or when its meaning is unclear.\ (quoting Smith–Cooper v. Cooper, 344 S.C. 289, 295, 543 S.E.2d 271, 274 (Ct. App. 2001))
- \A contract is ambiguous when it is capable of more than one meaning or when its meaning is unclear.\ (quoting Smith-Cooper v. Cooper, 344 S.C. 289, 301, 543 S.E.2d 271, 277 (Ct. App. 2001))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Stilwell, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pee Dee Stores, Inc. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-29· cited 51×
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 49×
- Lanier v. LanierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 38×
- Doe v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-05· cited 37×
- Holler v. HollerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 27×
- Nicholson v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-06· cited 22×
- Mr. T v. Ms. TCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-15· cited 15×
- Posner v. PosnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-16· cited 10×
- Duckett v. GoforthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-15· cited 7×
- Williamson v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-07· cited 5×
- S.C. Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Jimmerson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-12-30· cited 5×
- Maxwell v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-08-24· cited 2×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
- Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-09· cited 113×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- Lindsay v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 69×
- Shirley v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 63×
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 59×
- Badeaux v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 55×
- Murdock v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-20· cited 50×
- Emery v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-27· cited 48×
- Ellis v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-09-19· cited 48×
- Heins v. HeinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 47×
- Risinger v. RisingerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-03· cited 46×
- Smith-Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-02-12· cited 35×
- Ebert v. EbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-06· cited 31×
- Mattox v. CassadyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-05-27· cited 27×
- Dorchester County Department of Social Services v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 27×
- In re Marriage of LandfieldAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-02-08· cited 26×
- Greiman v. FriedmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-11-21· cited 22×
- Skull Creek Club Ltd. Partnership v. Cook & Book, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-10-04· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.