Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/16/1997

Smith v. Smith

Citations

486 S.E.2d 516
327 S.C. 448
1997 S.C. App. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding section 20-7-472 implicitly requires that marital debt, like marital property, be specifically identified and apportioned in the equitable distribution
holding the family court, in dividing the marital property, properly considered actions taken by the husband before the parties' actual separation, including opening and closing accounts and transferring money
noting fault is an appropriate factor for consideration in determining alimony in cases in which the misconduct affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage
section 20-7-472 implicitly requires that marital debt, like marital property, be specifically identified and apportioned in the equitable distribution
section 20-7-472 implicitly requires that marital debt, like marital property, be specifically identified and apportioned in the equitable distribution
South Carolina law provides that the family court judge may grant alimony in such amounts and for such term as the judge considers appropriate under the circumstances.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Howell, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.