Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/27/1989
Terwilliger v. Terwilliger
Citations
- 378 S.E.2d 609
- 298 S.C. 144
- 1989 S.C. App. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the family court, as the fact finder, determines the weight to be given to testimony
- holding the resolution of questions regarding credibility and the weight given to testimony is a function of the family court judge who heard the testimony
- Resolving questions of credibility is a function of the family court judge who heard the testimony.
- stating the family court, as the fact finder, determines the weight to be given to testimony
- refuting father’s claim that the family court erred in its custody decision by giving undue consideration to the testimony of mother’s expert witness, a clinical psychologist, despite psychologist not testing or communicating with the father
- \The failure to comply with [Rule 26(c)] by reason of the untimely filing of an order does not constitute reason to reverse where no prejudice results from the delay.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Sanders, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 80×
- Heins v. HeinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 47×
- Divine v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-28· cited 16×
- Marchant v. MarchantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-01· cited 15×
- Wooten v. WootenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-05· cited 9×
- Biggins v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-16· cited 7×
- Wooten v. WootenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 4×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cook v. CobbSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-06-22· cited 72×
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National Bank Ex Rel. Estate of LanhamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-07-08· cited 30×
- Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-03-02· cited 23×
- Thompson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-24· cited 18×
- State v. CaskeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-06-11· cited 18×
- Davenport v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-02· cited 17×
- Lyvers v. LyversCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-10· cited 14×
- Crewe v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-06-30· cited 12×
- Ortowski v. OrtowskiSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-01-13· cited 8×
- Ackerman v. AckermanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1966-12-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.