Skip to main content

Terwilliger v. Terwilliger

Citations

  • 378 S.E.2d 609
  • 298 S.C. 144
  • 1989 S.C. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the family court, as the fact finder, determines the weight to be given to testimony
  • holding the resolution of questions regarding credibility and the weight given to testimony is a function of the family court judge who heard the testimony
  • “Resolving questions of credibility is a function of the family court judge who heard the testimony.”
  • stating the family court, as the fact finder, determines the weight to be given to testimony
  • refuting father’s claim that the family court erred in its custody decision by giving undue consideration to the testimony of mother’s expert witness, a clinical psychologist, despite psychologist not testing or communicating with the father
  • \The failure to comply with [Rule 26(c)] by reason of the untimely filing of an order does not constitute reason to reverse where no prejudice results from the delay.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cureton, Sanders, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.