Van Ness v. Eckerd Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding courts retain jurisdiction to alter judgments for ten days if a motion to alter or amend a judgment is filed; however, after ten days that jurisdiction is lost
• applying Rule 63, SCRCP and finding that another circuit court judge should have heard party’s Rule 59(e
• determining, where the trial judge recused himself following the filing of a motion to reconsider, the issue of propriety of trial judge's recusal was not preserved for review because appellant failed to make a Rule 59(e) motion challenging the recusal
• “If a trial judge grants relief not previously contemplated or presented to the trial court, the aggrieved party must move, pursuant to Rule 59(e), SCRCP, to alter or amend the judgment in order to preserve the issue for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).