Supreme Court of Florida· 7/7/1994

Green v. State

Citations

641 So. 2d 391
1994 WL 318659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that photographic array was not suggestive even though the defendant was pictured with a darker background than the other photographs
finding that photographic array was not suggestive even though the defendant was pictured with a darker background than the other photographs
noting that the trial court found that “although the scent tracking was the only evidence that established Green’s identity, corroboration included . . . Green’s presence at his sister’s house earlier that day”
allowing evidence to be admitted where “the character and dependability of the dog were established, the officer who handled the dog was trained, and the evidence was relevant”
allowing evidence to be admitted where “the character and dependability 12 of the dog were established, the officer who handled the dog was trained, and the evidence was relevant”
death proportionate where defendant had been convicted of prior violent felony, murder was committed while defendant was engaged in kidnapping, and murder was committed for pecuniary gain and no mitigating factors were found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.