Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 630 So. 2d 1038
  • 1993 WL 517368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not err in instructing on flight because the defendant was tried before Fenelon was issued
  • concluding that DNA evidence linked Taylor to the victim because “the analyst testified that semen found in the victim’s blouse matched Taylor’s DNA profile”
  • new standard jury instruction on the aggravating factor of heinous, atrocious, or cruel is not unconstitutionally vague under Espinosa v. Florida, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2926, 120 L.Ed.2d 854 (1992)
  • \This Court intended that the holding in Fenelon be applied prospectively only.\
  • “In January, 1991, while Taylor’s former roommate was removing a fence behind the duplex, he discovered a small plastic bag buried in the ground near the fence. The bag contained the pieces of jewelry taken from the victim’s home during the attack and burglary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.